There is no sense in continuing to push for something (Warren for president) that simply won't happen. It would behoove Clinton to adopt them all, not just because it would grease her path in a primary that is hers if she runs, but because those positions are (mostly) popular with the broader American public. In other words, Warren's positions are widely popular inside the party. For example, there is near universal support among Democrats for student debt relief, near universal opposition to any cuts to Social Security, near universal support for breaking up big banks, and strong opposition to the TPP free trade deal and building the Keystone XL pipeline. ![]() On the other hand, the poll does point out the extreme popularity of populist positions, a message that Democrats (including Hillary) should take to heart. Warren has made it clear she doesn't want to run, and nothing in this poll suggests she's making the wrong choice. ![]() Got that? Despite making the strongest case for Warren while ignoring the opposition, she can't even get a third of primary/caucus voters to support her. Guess which candidate Markos suggested?Įspite the one-sided advocacy on behalf of Warren, she still doesn't come out with a clear lead, ahead just 31-24 in Iowa and 30-27 in New Hampshire. Markos suggested that Warren's populist message was just fine - but since he thought she had no chance of beating Clinton, and since Warren explicitly said she wasn’t running - he suggested the Left find an alternative candidate to deliver that populist message. Indeed, privileging good data over bad is central to allowing us to provide an accurate picture of the political landscape. Here’s how he began a February 2015 post which included some justifiable skepticism regarding the design of a poll that some folks who favored a Warren run were using to buttress their case:ĭaily Kos is a reality-based community, and part of that mission requires accurate reading of data. Last cycle Markos told our reality-based community that Elizabeth Warren wouldn’t run for president because she didn’t have the sort of ego or emotional and physical stamina that a presidential candidate requiresīefore the 2016 Democratic Primary season began, Markos wrote a number of diaries dismissing the idea that Elizabeth Warren would, or should, run for president against Hillary Clinton. It is one that Democrats and Progressives need to watch here.I. I had an extensive interview with Markos at Netroots Nation 2023, where we discussed this issue and many others. They are well funded and message in a manner that confuses many into voting against their own interest. They not only maintain the status quo but hurt the working class. It's critical for activists and politically engaged citizens to scrutinize these movements carefully, as they can serve as tools to dilute the push for meaningful change. They are trying to will a mythical center into existence to protect an abusive and greedy class. These "centrist" or "moderate" organizations often find financial backing from wealthy donors who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, which Moulitsas correctly points out. Moulitsas' questions shine a light on the vague mission of No Labels, which presents itself as a cure for partisanship but avoids taking a stance on issues that matter to Americans. It's worth noting that this interaction is a compelling example of the growing tension between grassroots progressive movements and more centrist or corporate-funded initiatives like No Labels. The Daily Kos founder emphasized that current progressive policies, particularly those supported by the Democratic Party, align with what a majority of Americans want, contrary to the No Labels narrative that a third party is necessary. He argued that No Labels is a "movement that says we stand for nothing." Markos also raised questions about the transparency and funding of the No Labels movement, suggesting that their goal is not to advance public interests but to slow down the shift towards more progressive policies in America. ![]() Moulitsas questioned the legitimacy of No Labels, asking what issues it stands for and pointing out that the group avoids taking positions on controversial subjects like abortion. He emphasized that the No Labels movement is gaining momentum. ![]() Markos Moulitsas, the founder of DailyKos, challenged Pat McCrory, the former governor of North Carolina and proponent of the No Labels third-party movement, during a segment on Meet the Press. McCrory claimed that 65% of Americans are dissatisfied with the two major parties and are seeking a third-party alternative.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |